Want the latest LendingTree Deals?

Just enter your email address below and we'll send you secret LendingTree deals every month.
Email

Quick question... Does anyone know of a Lending Tree mortgage servicing fraud expert? Hoping for any comment. Another quick question... 1*High-rate robbery.

2*Auto insurance is not fried chicken, and there's no reason the rate recipe should be such a deep, dark secret. Especially since most states require car /img/avatar4.jpgs to buy it..

3*Recently, while researching the causes behind soaring auto-insurance rates (see our Auto insurance report, available to subscribers only), Consumer Reports found that the most controversial new addition to the rate-setting formula is your credit score..

4*Now, however, insurers have discovered a new formula that can double your insurance premiums, even if your driving record is pristine. It’s called the insurance score, and it’s based on the premise that bad credit makes you a risky driver..

5*There is no standard mathematical model for this, and the social implications are unsettling. One insurance commissioner told us that insurers use credit scores to do what is otherwise illegaldiscriminate against low-income and minority consumers. Down-on-their-luck consumers, who may have skipped a payment or two because of layoffs, medical problems, or divorce, could find that a less-than-perfect Lending Tree credit score is driving their auto-insurance rates through the roof, even if they have always paid their auto-insurance bills on time and have had no accidents or speeding tickets..

6* They said those data are "proprietary information.".

7*learn what’s really driving rates..

8*Even those steps don't go far enough. Every state should ban companies from using credit scores to set rates..

Chmod444 |.

=======.

1*And Consumers should be I-Rate..

2*No but they're out to cook your goose..

Mandatory insurance is another farce..

3*Wonder why?.

4*So why are insurance Cos. putting all these dangerous drivers out on the highways?.

Why are insurers insuring drivers who don't need insurance?.

5*This is where the rule of 72 that Butch posted about comes into play..

6*In other words we hain't confessing!.

7*When you have all of the pieces of the puzzle you know..

8*This goes for both insurers and bankers..

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.

When you have all pieces of the puzzle you get the picture wither you call it a conspiracy of not..

Some pieces of the puzzle.

1*Paid politicians in Washington.

2*State insurance boards controlled by insurance companies.

3*Mandantory auto insurance..

4*False credit reports.

5*FICO.

6*Weak consumer laws..

7*Insurance lobbies.

8*Banking lobbies.

9*The rule of 72.

10*Al Capon type CAs..

LB 59..

asked Mar 02 at 22:07

Emilio's gravatar image

Emilio
106


The answer is Yes, but you might wanna make sure and wait for another member here to confirm my answer as I am not sure. Better yet, why don't you contact the Lending Tree guys because they can answer your Lending Tree question better...

answered Mar 02 at 23:27

Danika
's gravatar image

Danika
3249

MouthyMa,.

There's an FTC Opinion letter specifically on this subject, car dealers and inquiries they can't pull your reports if you are shopping around and double whammy for them, they surely don't have your signature..

I'm leaving in 8 minutes for my kid's christmas play, if I can't find it before then or someone doesn't post the link in the meantime, I'll surf it up as soon as I get home..

Sassy..

answered Mar 03 at 00:50

Elle
's gravatar image

Elle
3788

Http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fcra/coffey.htm.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580.

David Medine.

Associate Director.

Division of Credit Practices Direct Dial: 202-326-3224.

Fax : 202-326-2558.

E-mail: dmedine@ftc.gov.

February 11, 1998.

Karen Coffey, Chief Counsel.

Texas Automobile Dealers Assn..

1108 Lavaca P. O. Box 1028.

Austin, Texas 78767-1028.

Re: Section 604 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Dear Ms. Coffey:.

This responds to your letter dated August 29, 1997, asking the views of the Commission staff on a number of issues concerning application of the amended Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA"), including (1) the propriety of an auto dealership obtaining a consumer report from a consumer reporting agency ("CRA") on an individual who visits the showroom, (2) the disclosure required to be provided to a job applicant or current employee before a consumer report may be obtained by the employer, and (3) the items required to be provided to the consumer before adverse action may be taken by the employer based on the report..

1. Section 604(a)(3)(F) permits CRAs to provide consumer reports to any party who has a "legitimate business need for the information in connection with a business transaction that is initiated by the consumer." You ask whether this provision allows a dealer to obtain a consumer report on a person who "comes to an automobile dealership and requests information" from a salesman about one or more automobiles. In our view it does not, because a request for general information about products and prices offered does not involve a business transaction initiated by the consumer..

More generally, you ask "when is the beginning of a business transaction" initiated by the consumer? In responding to this question, it is important to note that Section 604(a)(3)(F) limits this "business need" permissible purpose to transactions (i) that are "initiated" by the consumer and (ii) where the seller has a "legitimate business need" for the information. The staff's view is that an automobile dealer may obtain a report only in those circumstances in which the consumer clearly understands that he or she is initiating the purchase or lease of a vehicle and the seller has a legitimate business need for the consumer report information in order to complete the transaction..

For example, a consumer who asks a dealer questions about prices and financing is not necessarily indicating an intent to purchase or lease a vehicle from that particular dealer. Nor does the dealer have a "legitimate" business need for a consumer report in this situation. The consumer may simply be comparison shopping. In such a situation, the dealer must obtain written permission from the consumer before obtaining a consumer report. If the dealer would like to see a consumer's credit report before answering general questions about the availability of financing, this must be explained to the consumer and written permission must be obtained. In the same way, a request to "test drive" a vehicle does not indicate an intent to initiate the purchase or lease of the vehicle.



Only in those circumstances where it is clear both to the consumer and to the dealer that the consumer is actually initiating the purchase or lease of a specific vehicle and, in addition, the dealer has a legitimate business need for consumer report information may the dealer obtain a report without written permission. In this regard, we note that obtaining information for negotiation purposes does not constitute a "legitimate" business need. The dealer must have a specific need for the information directly related to the completion of the transaction. For example, a dealer may obtain a report, if one is necessary, in order to arrange financing requested by the consumer.(1) The dealer may also obtain a report to check a consumer's creditworthiness when the consumer presents a personal check to pay for the vehicle. By contrast, a permissible purpose would not arise if a consumer intends to pay by cash..

2. Section 604(b)(2)(A) requires consumer report users, before procuring a report for employment purposes, to make a written disclosure to the consumer "in a document that consists solely of the disclosure" that a consumer report may be obtained for employment purposes. You ask whether a party that has secured an employee's authorization for the report in an employment application must also make the disclosure in a separate document. The answer is yes, because Section 604(b)(2)(A) specifically states that the document containing the required disclosure may not include other items..

You also ask what information may appear on the document and if "the FTC is suggesting that the document be of a certain size." It is our view that Congress intended that the disclosure not be encumbered with extraneous information. However, some additional information, such as a brief description of the nature of the consumer reports covered by the disclosure, may be included if the information does not confuse the consumer or detract from the mandated disclosure. We suggest no size requirement for the disclosure; a document that meets the "clear and conspicuous" standard set by the FCRA will be acceptable..

3. Finally, you ask two questions relating to Section 604(b)(3), which requires an employer "before taking any adverse action" based on a consumer report, to provide the consumer with a copy of the report and the summary of consumer FCRA rights prescribed by the Commission. First, you ask if a CRA is responsible for sending the required summary to employers. The answer is yes, because Section 604(b)(1)(B) imposes this duty on CRAs that provide reports for employment purposes. Second, you ask if there is any specific amount of time that must elapse from the time the required items are provided to the consumer and the employer's adverse employment action. The law is silent as to how long the employer must wait after making the Section 604(b)(3) pre-adverse action disclosure before actually taking adverse action; it states only that the specified items be provided before the adverse action is taken.



The opinions set forth in this informal staff letter are not binding on the Commission..

Yours truly,.

David Medine.

1. The dealer's "permissible purpose" here is provided by Section 604(a)(3)(A), which permits the use of consumer reports in connection with a credit transaction involving the consumer...

answered Mar 03 at 01:38

Reid's gravatar image

Reid
899

This touches some on shopping around..

Http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fcra/throne.htm.

16 C.F.R. 600 Appendix; 55 Fed. Reg.. 18,813 (May 4, 1990). In short, the Commentary treats entities as "joint users" when both parties are considering the same Lending Tree loan application and both have a permissible purpose.(1) The situation you present is the one set forth in the commentary example your client and the additional creditors to whom they forward a consumer's Lending Tree loan application are involved in the evaluation of a particular consumer Lending Tree loan application. Further, there is no doubt that your client has a permissible purpose in obtaining a consumer report in connection with a consumer's application for credit under Section 604(a)(3)(A)..

However, in order for the additional creditors to whom your client forwards the Lending Tree loan application to have a permissible purpose to obtain a consumer report, the potential credit transaction must be initiated by the consumer. For this reason, the Commentary notes that a lender may forward a Lending Tree loan application to another lender at the consumer's request. Accordingly, your client must obtain the consumer's consent prior to forwarding such information to additional lenders...

answered Mar 03 at 03:06

Paxton's gravatar image

Paxton
3946

Very cool, thanks for finding that, niteowl!.

Nice to meet you..

Sassy..

answered Mar 03 at 03:32

Tyler's gravatar image

Tyler
452

Which is also a bunch-a-crap!!.

From start to finish I have a whopping 2 whole weeks to secure a deal for a car..

LOL..

answered Mar 03 at 05:06

Brian's gravatar image

Brian
2714

No problem. I have been reading FTC opinion letters and state laws all day and happened to read that letter earlier. Hope it was of some help...

answered Mar 03 at 05:14

Heaven
's gravatar image

Heaven
2122

The 14 and 30 day rules only apply if a lender is using the next generation FICO score. Of course less than 20% are using it, so the multiple inquiries will kill your score with most creditors...

answered Mar 03 at 06:49

Salvador's gravatar image

Salvador
4634

Exactly! All that talk, LOL, and the truth is that most of the time they.

Do.

Hurt you...

answered Mar 03 at 07:02

Kailyn
's gravatar image

Kailyn
172

Your answer
toggle preview

powered by OSQA